-
- Evaluating
the project
-
- There are many elements in evaluating
a classroom project. Before you begin
developing instruments, identify the
levels of achievement. Be specific and
focused. What do the words exemplary,
acceptable, and minimal mean? Do they
translate to high school students as "way
sweet", "sweet", and "unsweet"? Consider
the SMART approach including ideas that
are Specific, Manageable, Achievable,
Reliable, and Targeted. Start by exploring
projects and rubrics developed by others
such as this High
School Government project.
-
- Don't just think of assessment as
something done at the end of a project.
Consider ways to conduct formative
assessment throughout the project
including student self-assessment,
peer-assessment, and even
teacher-assessment. Learn from these
experiences and revise materials as
needed. Explore existing assessment tools
such as this one on Planets.
-
- Assessment Considerations
- As you develop assessment, focus on
the task not the student. Focus on the
message in the visual, fonts used,
background selected, and sound quality. Be
sure to evaluate the entire process, not
just the product. This includes
preparation, product, and presentation.
The ThinkQuest project contains an
excellent rubric.
Try looking for each of the following
evaluation areas in the winning ThinkQuest
project called Rat
Tales.
-
|
|
-
- Cactus
Menu
- Task
- Activities
- Tools
- Resources
- Communications
- Implementation
- Evaluation
- Sharing
- Return
to Eduscapes
|
Preparation
- Preproduction Plan
- Purpose & audience clear
- Outline, storyboard, chart
- Varied information resources
- Reflection & drafting
- Product
- Content knowledge
- Text elements
- Image elements
- Voice/sound elements
- Design of communication
- Interactive elements
- Content Knowledge
- New learning
- Meaningful information
- Accurate, relevant, complete
- Focus with details
- Sources correctly cited
- Text Elements
- Good word choice
- Expressive, detailed, original
- Few technical errors
- Reflects grade level mechanics
- Image Elements
- Significant contribution
- Relevant
- Insightful
- Choices appropriate for content
- Accurate
- High technical quality
- Voice/Sound Elements
- Significant contribution
- Relevant
- Insightful
- Choices appropriate for content
- Accurate
- High technical quality
- Design of Communication
- Consistent visual theme
- Layout has balance/structure
- Fonts are readable/consistent
- Good use of space/color
- Transitions effective
- Overall design appeal/ease use
- Interactive Elements
- Linear Pathway
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Videotape
- Multiple Pathways
- Interactivity of Communication
- Rather than moving from screen to screen
users:
- make choices
- solve problems
- contribute to the project
- System Design
- Flow of communication
- Closed communication
- Open communication
- web links, email expert,
- use lab equipment, quiz
- Participatory Elements
- Email link or guest book
- Add a comment or idea
- Ask for images or data
- Involve in quiz, case, game
- Does involvement make sense?
- Does the request match need?
- Navigation
- User Orientation
- Main Menu, Table of Contents
- Movement
- Multimedia Elements
- Links to External Resources
- Repetitive Participation
- Encourages revisits
- Project evolves
- Interaction
-
- Presentation
- Sharing or discussion
- Setup of computer area
- Oral presentation
- Ease of use
-
- Cactus
Exploration
|
-
- Explore the
Frog
Project and
rubric.
-
- Use the following
websites to locate rubrics that can be
used in project evaluation. Compare and
contrast these tools and develop your
own.
|
-
Cactus Menu / Task
/ Activities / Tools
/ Resources / Communications
/ Implementation /
Evaluation / Sharing
- Return to
Eduscapes
-
Created by Annette
Lamb, 02/01.
|